<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aerar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://en.aerar.de/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://en.aerar.de</link>
	<description>A commonplace of german politics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Wiki: guidelines</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/30/wiki-guidelines/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/30/wiki-guidelines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[political trade]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[guidelines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 5 May, 2010)
In my first drafts for a political program (German) I have examined guidelines (German), which should give the program a direction and which could serve as a basis for concrete political answers. In the beginning there will be no complete set of guidelines and especially in special themes they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/30/wiki-guidelines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I do not understand it</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/29/i-do-not-understand-it/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/29/i-do-not-understand-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[parties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[agenda]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nordrhein-Westfalen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 2 May, 2010)
I am not really surprised when a study of the Communication Labs Ulm and the University of Hohenheim comes to the result that the agendas of the parties for the elections in NRW are hard to understand (German). After all I thing here politicians are writing for politicians and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/29/i-do-not-understand-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Household fee instead of GEZ</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/19/household-fee-instead-of-gez/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/19/household-fee-instead-of-gez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Carta]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GEZ]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Paul Kirchhof]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 2 May, 2010)
Believing an expertise of the constitutional law expert Paul Kirchhof there are no constitutional concerns about a household based fee instead of the current device based fee. This would be in contradiction with prior reports from October of the last year which came to a different conclusion:
my  translation: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/19/household-fee-instead-of-gez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wiki: Sketching a political program</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/18/wiki-sketching-a-political-program/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/18/wiki-sketching-a-political-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wiki]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 1 May, 2010)
Basic situation
Considering the drawbacks of dealing with political themes in a blog, I have decided to start in addition a Wiki where I will try to develope a draft of a new political program:
Aerar-Politischer  Programmentwurf (German)
The Wiki as platform
I believe that a wiki is a good technical platform [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/18/wiki-sketching-a-political-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The (political) blog as media</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/17/the-political-blog-as-media/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/17/the-political-blog-as-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aerar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 30 April, 2010)
With this blog I decided to temporarily inform about recent political events and to offer an opinion as a basis for a discussion. Beside of the limited number of readers and the little available time of the author I noticed some principle limits which probably other blogs do share. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/07/17/the-political-blog-as-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Badly calculated</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/26/badly-calculated/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/26/badly-calculated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 16:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[federal states]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[parties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CDU]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nordrhein-Westfalen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prognosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 25 April, 2010)
“Nach der aktuellen Umfrage von tns Emnid im Auftrag des Magazins “Focus” kommt die CDU NRW bei der Sonntagsfrage zur Landtagswahl am 9. Mai auf 38 Prozent. Die SPD hingegen liegt bei 34 Prozent, Die Grünen bei 11 Prozent, die FDP bei 8 Prozent und die Linkspartei bei 6 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/26/badly-calculated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re critique</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/11/re-critique/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/11/re-critique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[particulars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[parties]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[political trade]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Banken]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Carta]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FDP]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Monitor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steffen Rutter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 31 March, 2010)
I have to admit that a certain FDP bashing currently (not without course) is quite modern. Therefore one needs to be careful not simply to call &#8220;Boooh&#8221; by reflex if the party&#8217;s name is mentioned and of course should not believe in everything shown on TV. So I relate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/11/re-critique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Easing lay-off protection?</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/08/easing-lay-off-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/08/easing-lay-off-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 14:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[consumption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[employer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lay-off protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 26 March, 2010)
Within a study the OECD is demanding  to ease the lay-off protection in germany (German) and in fact there are many good reasons to ease or even end the lay-off protection. Currently there is an unbalance in the relation between employers and employees. While the employee is allowed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/08/easing-lay-off-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work less - archieve more</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/07/work-less-archieve-more/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/07/work-less-archieve-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 13:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Banker]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Harvard-Business-Manager-Magazin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[manager]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 13 March, 2010)

(Screenshot from Harvard-Business-Manager-Magazin)
&#8220;Berater, Banker, Wirtschaftsprüfer, Manager - sie alle haben das Gefühl, immer im Dienst zu sein.&#8221; (my translation: &#8220;Consultants, bankers, accountants and managers - they all have the feeling of beeing always on duty.&#8221;) This is what the Harvard-Business-Manager-Magazin is writing in its online issue. A little bit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/07/work-less-archieve-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Money for nothing?</title>
		<link>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/06/money-for-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/06/money-for-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 12:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aerar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hartz IV]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[minimum wages]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social welfare]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[unconditional basic income]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://en.aerar.de/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
(German version published on 28 February, 2010)
The social state made it its task to attend to its citizens at least with the minimum which is necessary for a humane live. And it is right doing so as by this he gains a part of its moral justification, creates trust among its people and improves its [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://en.aerar.de/2010/05/06/money-for-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
